Social Science – Sociology Assignment 8

© 2021 Walden University, LLC. Adapted from Plummer, S. -B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. M. (Eds.). (2014).
Sessions: Case histories. Laureate International Universities Publishing.
Sara is a 72-year-old widowed Caucasian female who lives in a two-bedroom apartment
with her 48-year-old daughter, Stephanie, and six cats. Sara and her daughter have
lived together for the past 10 years since Stephanie returned home after a failed
relationship and was unable to live independently. Stephanie has a diagnosis of bipolar
disorder, and her overall physical health is good. Stephanie has no history of treatment
for alcohol or substance use; during her teens she drank and smoked marijuana but no
longer uses these substances. When she was 16 years old, Stephanie was hospitalized
after her first bipolar episode. She had attempted suicide by swallowing a handful of
Tylenol® and drinking half a bottle of vodka after her first boyfriend broke up with her.
She has been hospitalized three times in the past 4 years when she stopped taking her
medications and experienced suicidal ideation. Stephanie’s current medications are
Lithium, Paxil®, Abilify®, and Klonopin®.
Stephanie recently had a brief hospitalization as a result of depressive symptoms. She
attends a mental health drop-in center twice a week to socialize with friends and
receives outpatient psychiatric treatment at a local mental health clinic for medication
management and weekly therapy. She is maintaining a part-time job at a local
supermarket where she bags groceries and is currently being trained to become a
cashier. Stephanie has active Medicare and receives Social Security Disability (SSD).
Sara has recently been hospitalized for depression and has some physical issues. She
has documented high blood pressure and hyperthyroidism, she is slightly underweight,
and she is displaying signs of dementia. Sara has no history of alcohol or substance
use. Her current medications are Lexapro® and Zyprexa®. Sara has Medicare and
receives Social Security benefits and a small pension. She attends a day treatment
program for seniors that is affiliated with a local hospital in her neighborhood. Sara
attends the program 3 days a week from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., and van service is
provided free of charge.
A telephone call was made to Adult Protective Services (APS) by the senior day
treatment social worker when Sara presented with increased confusion, poor attention
to daily living skills, and statements made about Stephanie’s behavior. Sara told the
social worker at the senior day treatment program that, “My daughter is very
argumentative and is throwing all of my things out.” She reported, “We are fighting like
cats and dogs; I’m afraid of her and of losing all my stuff.”
Home Visit
During the home visit, the APS worker observed that the living room was very cluttered,
but that the kitchen was fairly clean, with food in the refrigerator and cabinets. Despite
the clutter, all of the doorways, including the front door, had clear egress. The family
lives on the first floor of the apartment building and could exit the building without
difficulty in case of emergency. The litter boxes were also fairly clean, and there was no
sign of vermin in the home.

© 2021 Walden University, LLC. Adapted from Plummer, S. -B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. M. (Eds.). (2014).
Sessions: Case histories. Laureate International Universities Publishing.
Upon questioning by the APS worker, Sara denied that she was afraid of her daughter
or that her daughter had been physically abusive. In fact, the worker observed that
Stephanie had a noticeable bruise on her forearm, which appeared defensive in nature.
When asked about the bruise, Stephanie reported that she had gotten it when her
mother tried to grab some items out of her arms that she was about to throw out.
Stephanie admitted to throwing things out to clean up the apartment, telling the APS
worker, “I’m tired of my mother’s hoarding.” Sara agreed with the description of the
incident. Both Sara and Stephanie admitted to an increase in arguing but denied
physical violence. Sara stated, “I didn’t mean to hurt Stephanie. I was just trying to get
my things back.”
The APS worker observed that Sara’s appearance was unkempt and disheveled, but
her overall hygiene was adequate (i.e., clean hair and clothes). Stephanie was neatly
groomed with good hygiene. The APS worker determined that no one was in immediate
danger to warrant removal from the home but that the family needed a referral for
Intensive Case Management (ICM) services. It was clear there was some conflict in the
home that had led to physical confrontations. Further, the house had hygiene issues,
including trash and items stacked in the living room and Sara’s room, which needed to
be addressed. The APS worker indicated in her report that if not adequately addressed,
the hoarding might continue to escalate and create an unsafe and unhygienic
environment, thus leading to a possible eviction or recommendation for separation and
relocation for both women.
As the ICM worker, I visited the family to assess the situation and the needs of the
clients. Stephanie said she was very angry with her mother and sick of her compulsive
shopping and hoarding. Stephanie complained that they did not have any visitors and
she was ashamed to invite friends to the home due to the condition of the apartment.
When I asked Sara if she saw a problem with so many items littering the apartment,
Sara replied, “I need all of these things.” Stephanie complained that when she tried to
clean up and throw things out, her mother went outside and brought it all back in again.
We discussed the need to clean up the apartment and make it habitable for them to
remain in their home, based on the recommendations of the APS worker. I also
discussed possible housing alternatives, such as senior housing for Sara and a
supportive apartment complex for Stephanie. Sara and Stephanie both stated they
wanted to remain in their apartment together, although Stephanie questioned whether
her mother would cooperate with cleaning up the apartment. Sara was adamant that
she did not want to be removed from their apartment and would try to accept what
needed to be done so they would not be forced to move.
Stephanie mentioned she was dissatisfied with her mother’s psychiatric treatment and
felt she was not getting the help she needed. She reported that her mother was very
anxious and was having difficulty sleeping, staying up until all hours of the night, and
buying items from a televised shopping network. Sara’s psychiatrist had recently

© 2021 Walden University, LLC. Adapted from Plummer, S. -B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. M. (Eds.). (2014).
Sessions: Case histories. Laureate International Universities Publishing.
increased her Zyprexa prescription dosage to help reduce her agitation and possible
bipolar disorder (as evidenced by the compulsive shopping), but Stephanie did not feel
this had been helpful and wondered if it was contributing to her mother’s confusion. I
asked for permission to contact both of their outpatient treatment teams, and the
request was granted.
I then arranged to meet with Sara and her psychiatrist to discuss her increased anxiety
and confusion and the compulsive shopping. I requested a referral for neuropsychiatric
testing to assess possible cognitive changes or decline in functioning. A test was
scheduled, and it indicated some cognitive deficits, but at the end of testing, Sara told
the psychologist who administered the tests she had stopped taking her medications for
depression. It was determined Sara’s depression and discontinuation of medication
could have affected her test performance and it was recommended she be retested in 6
months. I suggested a referral to a geriatric psychiatrist for Sara, as she appeared to
need more specialized treatment. Sara’s psychologist agreed.
Because they had both stated that they did not want to be removed from their home, I
worked with Sara and Stephanie as a team to address cleaning the apartment. All
agreed that they would begin working together to clean the house for 1 hour a day until
arrangements were made for additional help from family members. To alleviate Sara’s
anxiety around throwing out the items, I suggested using three bags for the initial
cleanup: one bag was for items she could throw out, the second bag was for “maybes,”
and the third was for “not ready yet.” I scheduled home visits at the designated cleanup
time to provide support and encouragement and to intervene in disputes. I also
contacted Sara’s treatment team to inform them of the cleanup plans and suggested
that Sara might need additional support and observation as it progressed.
We then discussed placement for at least some of the cats, because six seemed too
many for a small apartment. Sara and Stephanie were at first adamant that they could
not give up their cats, but with further discussion admitted it had become extremely
difficult to manage caring for them all. They both eventually agreed to each keep their
favorite cat and find homes for the other four. Sara and Stephanie made fliers and
brought them to their respective treatment programs to hand out. Stephanie also
brought fliers about the cats to her place of employment. Three of the four cats were
adopted within a week.
During one home visit, Stephanie pulled me aside and said she had changed her
mind—she did not want to continue to live with her mother. She requested that I
complete a housing application for supportive housing stating, “I want to get on with my
life.” Stephanie had successfully completed cashier training, and the manager of the
supermarket was pleased with her performance and was prepared to hire her as a part-
time cashier soon. She expressed concern about how her mother would react to this
decision and asked me for assistance telling her.

© 2021 Walden University, LLC. Adapted from Plummer, S. -B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. M. (Eds.). (2014).
Sessions: Case histories. Laureate International Universities Publishing.
We all met together to discuss Stephanie’s decision to apply for an apartment. Sara was
initially upset and had some difficulty accepting this decision. Sara said she had fears
about living alone, but when we discussed senior living alternatives, Sara was adamant
she wanted to remain in her apartment. Sara said she had lived alone for a number of
years after her husband died and felt she could adjust again. I offered to help her stay in
her apartment and explore home care services and programs available that will meet
her current needs to remain at home.


(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)


The Best Custom Essay Writing Service

About Our Service

We are an online academic writing company that connects talented freelance writers with students in need of their services. Unlike other writing companies, our team is made up of native English speakers from countries such as the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand.

Qualified Writers

  • At, most of our writers are degree-holding native speakers of English who are familiar with various writing styles. Our writers are proficient in many fields, including Economics, Business, Accounting, Finance, Medicine, Chemistry, Literature, Mathematics, Statistics, and many others.
  • Making our customers happy is an important part of our service. So do not be surprised if you get your paper well before the deadline!
  • We pay a lot of attention to ensuring that you get excellent customer service. You can contact our Customer Support Representatives 24/7. When you order from us, you can even track the progress of your paper as it is being written!
  • We are attentive to the needs of our customers. Therefore, we follow all your instructions carefully so that you can get the best paper possible.
  • It matters to us who writes for you, and we are serious about selecting the best candidates.
  • Our writers are always learning something new, so they are familiar with the latest developments in the scientific world and can write papers with updated information and the latest findings.

Our Guarantees:

  • Quality original papers that follow your instructions carefully.
  • On time delivery – you get the paper before the specified deadline.
  • Attentive Customer Support Representatives available 24/7.
  • Complete confidentiality – we do not share you details or papers with anybody else.